|
|
EVERYONE, EVERYWHERE! Indiana has set a precedent with its "as yet
unproven" evasion of taxes case against the Garwoods of Mauckport,
Indiana, that is now being followed by other states. TN has a case
pending similar to what just occurred in Indiana...seizing dogs for
alleged "unpaid sales tax." The CA Franchise Tax Board is now sending
out letters to dog owners who have been identified as possibly "selling
dogs."
Permission to cross post everywhere!
Permission to cross post granted.
In California a friend got a letter from the "Tax Board" dated
6-10-2009. Seems that "someone" went on the AKC web site and must have
used a link to the our national breed club to find names of potential
puppy sellers.
Here's part of her message regarding the letter from the California
State Board of Equalization:
/ /Just this morning I received a letter from the Ca State Board of
Equalization saying that they had gotten information from the American
Kennel Club Web site that I might be selling animals and I needed a
seller's permit. I just phoned the American Kennel Club to inquire as to whether or
not they provide information and if there is a list on their web site of
breeders. AKC says that their web site information is not provided to
agencies like that. There is a link on the web site to our National
club's web site and breeders list...I am sure that is where California
got my name and address. Now I have to respond within 30 days...Oh yes...and...the letter says that if we purchase a dog from someone out of the state of
California, we are required to pay a "use" tax. -end-
After reading this and the actual letter, I asked if anyone knew of
others that had gotten letters such as my friend rec'd. I asked on a
list with people in multiple breeds in multiple states. And got a reply
with the following:
I'm guessing this is HSUS/PeTA lead after the "sting" in
Indiana where they seized a commercial kennel (took the dogs) for sales
taxes owed. It worked there, I'm guessing they are now scanning
throughout the country. The Indiana governor "thanked" HSUS for bringing
the lapse to their attention. It worked once, likely to work again. -end-
So it seems H$U$/PeTA was behind a TAX issue in another state. I wonder
if H$US and/or PeTA are doing this in CA. Because in my opinion, now
they are going after the good guys.. Going after people that don't sell
puppies such as my friend in CA. Going after people that don't sell
puppies is something I find to be an absolute waste of time, energy and
money ..in other words typical waste of generously donated
dollars people give to the H$U$ and/or PeTA.. -As far as I can tell the
H$U$ is an AR group that operates ZERO shelters. And PeTA, also an AR
group has a single "shelter". A shelter with a kill rate well over 90%.
I also feel this is also a waste of a State employee's time. Someone had
to write the letter, print it, mail it, file the copy, open a file in my
friends name to be tracked. And some state employee is going to have to
read what ever is sent back and update the file. Then will argue even
though she sold no puppies she owes for something. I figure this
single letter costs our state quite a few actual dollars: the
employee's time (to research and write the letter, paid to a person),
paper and envelope, fuel (to deliver), the postage (paid to the USPS),
electricity (to print, fold and stamp, paid to PG&E), and that is just
to produce the letter. There is also all the processing and file
updating, mailroom, delivery to the right person... phone calls "if you
have any questions you may call me".
I have no legal background. But feel that if the Tax Board thinks you
owe them money in sales tax, that its up to them to prove you do and how
much, -BUT- that's only IF you do NOT already have a sellers permit.
Because if you have a resale license you may have signed off on allowing
them the burden of proof by applying for one. My friend does have a
kennel permit (for her personal dogs), so that may have been used as
well. I do know you give up many of your rights when you apply for a
kennel permit. -where I live, you grant unannounced inspections just for
applying for a permit.
How do you prove you are not selling puppies? I can see how you can
show proof that you have.. but how do you prove somethibg that does not
exist?
So be warned.. Cities and States are hard up for money. They are going
after every penny they can get. And they are using anything they can,
to do so. I, myself paid dearly on a technicality, several months ago.
I had to pay fines that were basically DOUBLE the lic fee to my city.
I had a small retail space I rented in another city where I sold my
books and crafts. Turned out I needed a business license in my city
simply because I had a sellers permit with the State of CA. It should
be noted, I owed zero sales tax because I have faithfully paid my sales
taxes each and every year.
So, be warned BIG BROTHER is out there.
Categories: Legislation, Breeders, Kennel